Thursday, February 18, 2021

Two obviously innocent ladies. Lawrencia bembenek and .Sandra melger












This first post attached to this website will address the cases of sandra melger and lawrenicia bembenek. Two obviously innocent ladies who have had their lives destroyed by incompetent police forces in america. To the reader. 

In connection to the following:
















๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿ™€๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐ŸงŸ‍♂️the following website is a website which mostly addresses true crime stories on youtube.๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐ŸŽต๐Ÿคจ๐Ÿฅณ๐Ÿคช๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ˜๐ŸŽตthe website has other purposes.






๐Ÿงž‍♂️๐Ÿ—ฃ๐Ÿ”‰๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿšด‍♀️๐Ÿ˜ฏ๐Ÿšด‍♂️yet the main purpose to this website is a review of true crime addressed on youtube.

๐Ÿ“ข๐ŸŽถ๐Ÿฆ’๐Ÿ”Š๐Ÿฑ๐Ÿคธ‍♂️๐ŸŽต๐Ÿคกokay. ๐ŸฏThat said " I now begin this website with the following topic. 



๐ŸฆŠ๐Ÿ””๐ŸŽถwhich is the true crime subject which applies to a mrs sandra melger.

๐Ÿ””๐Ÿ”ˆ๐Ÿฆ๐ŸŽต๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿคก๐Ÿคช

That lady and her story is where I will begin this website.



Which will cover a variety of true crime stories. Yet this lady"and her true crime story "" I feel is the best place" for this website to appropriately commence.


The subject of her crime? Or supposed crime? It is summarized in the video attached immediately below.

And"with every post attached to the first part of this website so  that is where I shall begin the functions of each post. Including this one.

So I begin this post with the assumption that the readers have watched the video and therefore are aware of the general premises of each true crime case.







A brief note regaRding this website? It will include sarcastic sentiments .

In words images and videos.

At times.

Such images videos or sarcastic comments are attached to this site for rational purposes which aPply to what is obviously being addressed in each post .

Obviously.

In relation to the youtube videos attached to each post.

The prosecution " for example? In the case of sandra melger.

Smiled a lot.






Grinning deviously. almost . Reflective of matthew 10: 14 to 16 or 2nd peter 2: 11 to 15 of christianitys scriptures.


Or so it definitely looked.


To the reader: do note that truth.

So on that note here we go with the case of sandra melger.


Let us begin this post on such a womans apparent crime by first clarifying some basic obvious facts related to her crime.


First.

Shall we? Yes let's do just that. By which factor i begin this post by first stating the following.

The police investigating this crime would have the public believe miss melger is a murderess.



Woe no!!!!

But the police do offer some clues as to why they believe such a statement.

I debate their claims.


And i " like the narrator of this said video" on such a subject below give some very healthy explanations as to why i feel this woman is innocent of the crime of murder.

In this case. 

In a world gone completely mad.

 OOOH?



























































Wherein let's get into that very subject right now. Shall we? Yes. We shall. By stating this.

First.


First off .....hello?

https://youtu.be/yUi796eyqkw 

Did the police investigating this  crime " first off" consider this statement?

Just because blood is spread about  and a struggle seems to have occurred does not mean that is what happened. 


Jim could have been killed fairly quickly by a psychopath who continued to stab jim.

Making it look like a struggle took place when jim was basically killed quickly.

A quick fatal blow and her husband is dead.

Or he had been subdued physically in a way his screams or shouts were muffled.
Not much noise coming from him after that.




Further
She has the noise of the jacuzzi.




She also doesnt have good hearing.
A combination of lupus and arthritis plus the fact a jacuzzi can sometimes put you in laa laa land.





Where your in another world mentally.



Then you often miss sounds.


During certain times you are relaxing in a jacuzzi.


Also it appears she may have had a seizure while this was playing out.







Her neurologist testified this was probably what happened.


Which is also why she says she heard nothing.

Also" it's clear everyone was testifying she couldnt hold a knife and do what happened.




Obviously.
Also ๐Ÿคจ
No evidence at all to suggest this woman even knew how to hire a professional killer .





At all.
Probably never even met one.




I dont think it ever even crossed her mind.
Clearly that's not her.
Clearly shes not a killer.





Also' shes tied up in a way where WITNESSES say she clearly clearly could not have tied herself up like that.


And then locked herself in a closet.



Those are all factors which would indicate this lady is completely innocent.
When it's that clear someone is innocent of a murder?



Then 
What the hell is this?




And your telling me this Chad guy' , whatever mike said his last name was" was not investigated basically at all?


AT ALL. THE POLICE STOPPED BY HIS PLACE? ONE MERRY DAY?

TO SAY HELLO?


HE WASNT HOME.

SO THEY LEFT THEIR CARD?


AND NEVER RETURNED TO TALK WITH HIM?


PERHAPS CHAD WASNT HOME BECAUSE, BECAUSE HE WAS OUT WITH HIS SPANISH GIRLFRIEND AT THE TIME?


PARTYING WITH others.




With THE MONEY THEY STOLE FROM THE MELGERS.




THAT SURE SOUNDS CORRECT.


WHY IS THIS WOMAN SITTING IN JAIL?


ARE THE POLICE IN THIS CASE  FUCKING CRAZY?




OKAY.


SURE 

YEAH.


YEAH.

OKAY.

 THE POLICE NEED TO BE SUED.



RIGHT AWAY.


BY SANDRA MEGERS DAUGHTER.

IM SERIOUS.

WHY?

BECAUSE ITS WELL KNOWN THAT PEOPLE WHO SUFFER FROM EPILEPSY FORGET DETAILS.


OF OCCURRENCES.

SOMETIMES.



SEE?

THAT MEANS " BECAUSE THE POLICE DIDNT IMMEDIATELY SEARCH THAT POSSIBILITY OUT" CHAD HAD ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD TO TELL HIS SPANISH GIRL FRIEND  AT THE TIME OF THE


MURDER TO LEAVE TOWN.

THE ONE WHO ACTUALLY STABBED JIM TO DEATH.

THE SPANISH WOMAN THAT SANDRA REMEMBERED.




WHILE CHAD STOOD BEHIND HER.

Drooling.


DURING THE KILLING.

SEE?





SAY?

IM CURIOUS.


What sort of police training are cops required to go through?






IN THIS AREA OF THE WORLD.



To be this incompetent?
Or corrupt? One or the other?




Either way
The cops in this case are obviously " really something else.





Serve and protect?




is that what you call this police work?
REALLY?




Sandra melger would have been better off here if two retarded moose were investigating this murder case in her defence.





Irrefutably.

This is worse detective work then the keddie cabin murders.



Wow.
Anyways heres what most likely happened.

It was CHAD -WHATS HIS NAME.


AND SOME SPANISH WOMAN CHAD KNEW AT THE TIME.


WHO KILLED JIM.

IM PRETTY SURE.


OR OR
Somebody they knew and who didnt like the melgers set this up.


MAYBE IT WAS THE NEIGHBOUR WHO HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT THE LITTLE PUPPIES BARKING.

FOR YEARS.


OBVIOUSLY IT WAS SOMEBODY.


BUT IT WASNT SANDRA MELGER.


It was obviously a set up.




IF IT WASNT CHAD? WHICH I HIGHLY DOUBT IT WASNT THAT GUY.

THEN HERES WHAT YOU Do.

IN THIS CASE.

First true detective step here?
Talk to the daughter. 
And sandra about any suspicious characters.
In their past.




Tell real  detectives to begin there.
Obviously.




But
With these key stone cops in charge? 
Start praying.
Pure and simple.



A final word?

On this case?

This is a letter I have forwarded to Sandra's lawyer. 


Presently.

In this case.


Addressed as follows.






To sandra melgers daughter. 

  look at these facts.


Closely.


These facts prove your mother is innocent.

That means the american constitution states she is to be set free.
Immediately.


In ■■■■summary■■■ it does.
Just check. To see.

So?
What's going on here?
On that note ?
Addressed?



Good question.
Eh liz?

I cover your case in the first post.
Attached here.
In this website.
Which I have addressed on mostly  matters of true crime in america.


See the opening or first post for information applicable to sandra.


P.s. 

With this information likewise.

Which I forgot to include.

Also applied to your case.
Worded as follows.





Also almost all true crime experts will tell you polygraph tests do not hold any valid credibility in the final analysis of a case.
The point?


The prosecutors the police and the judge and basically anyone in a position of authority? 

In the matter of this case? 
Who found sandra guilty?
Who are these people?


For real? 
Are they evil spirits in human form?
As 2nd corinthians 11: 13 to 15 so warns humans?


Connected to 1st Corinthians 6; 1 to 3?
I mean... seriously....



All facts in the case of sandra melger confirm the lady is innocent.
So?

You know what a fact is?
Huh?

What in the world is going on here?
Excellent.

EXCELLENT!!!

MISS ZELLNER?
LOOK AT THE FACTS.

THEN HIRE A LICENCED  PRIVATE
DETECTIVE TO IMMEDIATELY INVESTIGATE THE EXACT WHERABOUTS OF A CHAD SULLIVAN.

SEEN AROUND THE AREA.
AND SOMEONE WHO LIVED NEAR SANDRA MELGER.
AT THE TIME THE MURDER OF JIM MELGER OCCURRED.


CONNECT SIMPLE DOTS.
.ITS NOT HARD.
YOU KNOW?
IF YOUR A COP.


WERE THE PEOPLE WHO INVESTIGATED THIS CASE LICENCED COPS?
DID THEY GO TO SCHOOL?๐Ÿฅณ

WHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE๐Ÿคก
COP SCHOOL?๐ŸงŸ‍♂️
I MEAN?๐Ÿ˜ฑ
ACTUALLY YOU DONT REALLY HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL TO FIGURE THIS OUT.๐Ÿคช


JUST LOOK AT CHAD SULLIVAN.


I THINK THE INFORMATION I ENCOUNTERED ON THE CASE STATED HIS NAME WAS CHAD SULLIVAN?
PRETTY SURE.



ANYWAYS SOMEONE WAS REPORTED SEEN AROUND THE CRIME SCENE.
THE NEXT DAY.
LOOKING SUSPICIOUS.


PRETTY SURE THE REPORT SAID HIS NAME WAS CHADDIE SULLIVAN.

IM BASICALLY SURE ITS HIM.
I MIGHT BE WRONG.
BUT " IM QUESSING?
IT WAS CHAD.
AND A FEMALE ACCOMPLICE.

OF HIS.





IF YOU SEARCH CLOSELY?





WITH A DETECTIVE?
YOULL FIND EVIDENCE THAT CHAD DID IT.
WITH A YOUNG  SPANISH WOMAN.

AS SANDRAS EPILEPSY DIDNT ALLOW HER TO IMMEDIATELY RECALL?
SHE RECALLED SEEING A SPANISH LADY STABBING JIM WILDLY.






WHILE CHAD HELD SANDRA.





AS FAR AS I CAN SEE?
THATS THE MOST LIKELY SCENARIO.

MAYBE IT WAS THE NEIGBOURS? WHO COULDNT STAND THE BARKING DOGS.
YA NEVER KNOW?







CRAZIER SITUATIONS HAVE MANIFESTED THEMSELVES.






BUT" FOR THE RECORD 


CHAD HAD A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE.
AND ASSAULTS.






AND CLEARLY MONEY" A FEW OTHER ITEMS  AND A TV WERE MISSING FROM THE HOUSE.







OF THE MELGERS.






A  FEW ITEMS MONEY FROM SANDRAS PURSE  AND A TV WAS MISSING?







CHAD WAS CLEARLY KNOWN TO BE A SMALL TIME VIOLENTHOOD?
AND A THIEF?





AND THE POLICE DIDNT SEARCH CHADS HOUSE?




ESPECIALLY AFTER A TV REPORTER REPORTED TO POLICE THAT HE SAW CHAD?
AND RECOGNIZED HIM.






AS A HOODLUM ? WHO HAD BEEN IN TROUBLE WITH THE LAW? NUMEROUS TIMES?


ROAMING AROUND THE CRIME SCENE?





KOOKING AROUND?
LOOKING PARANOID SUSPICIOUS AND NUTS?
THE POLICE SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.




FOR NOT PURSUING THAT LEAD.
THEY LEFT A CARD?


ON HIS DOOR? ONE TIME? BEGGING CHAD TO CALL THEM?  Perhaps chad was busy at that moment? 
Robbing and then Tying a woman to rail way tracks? Who knows? 


But anyways " that's all the police did? THATS ALL? THATS ACTUALLY FACTUAL.



WOW? OKAY.
SO?
THE LONGER THEY DID NOT DO THE RIGHT THING THERE THE LONGER CHAD HAD TO HIDE THE STOLEN ITEMS.
COOL.

AND THE LONGER CHAD HAD TO TELL HIS SPANISH GIRLFRIEND TO HIDE.

.


THATS EVEN COOLER.
WELL DONE.
TO THE POLICE.
IN THIS MATTER.
COOL 



HE MUST HAVE MADE A MISTAKE.
SOMEWHERE.
I JUST DONT SEE IT.
RIGHT NOW.


I EXPLAIN THAT IN THE FIRST POST HERE.


TOO.
.
Hide quoted text


On Fri., Feb. 19, 2021, 10:17 a.m. coelus james, <whichwaytothebeachonmarch3@gmail.com> wrote:

To sandra melgers daughter. 


  look at these facts.

Closely.


These facts prove your mother is innocent.

That means the american constitution states she is to be set free.

Immediately.

In ■■■■summary■■■ it does.
Just check. To see.
























 




 



 


 




So?
What's going on here?
On that note ?
Addressed?



Good question.

Eh liz?


I cover your case in the first post.
Attached here.
In this website.
Which I have addressed on mostly  matters of true crime

in america.

See the opening or first post for information applicable to sandra.



P.s. 

With this information likewise.

Which I forgot to include.


Also applied to your case.
Worded as follows.





Also almost all true crime experts will tell you polygraph tests do not hold any valid credibility in the final analysis of a case.

The point?

The prosecutors the police and the judge and basically anyone in a position of authority? 

In the matter of this case? 
Who found sandra guilty?
Who are these people?



For real? 

Are they evil spirits in human form?
As 2nd corinthians 11: 13 to 15 so warns humans?

Connected to 1st Corinthians 6; 1 to 3?
I mean... seriously....


All facts in the case of sandra melger confirm the lady is innocent.
So?

You know what a fact is?
Huh?
What in the world is going on here?

Okay. Point made on that subject . Of miss sandra melger okay. Excellent.

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿ’๐Ÿธ๐Ÿคช๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿถ๐Ÿง๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ””๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿ˜ป๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿค’๐ŸŽต๐Ÿฅณ๐ŸฆŠ๐Ÿน๐Ÿฆ๐ŸŽถ๐ŸŽบ๐ŸŽป๐ŸŽท๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ’๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ””๐Ÿคช๐Ÿฅ๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ””๐Ÿคช๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐Ÿง๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿค’๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ””๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿถ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐Ÿง๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿธ๐Ÿ””๐Ÿคช๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿฃ๐Ÿคน‍♂️๐Ÿง๐ŸงŸ‍♀️๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿคก๐Ÿ””๐Ÿคช

Now " for part two of this opening post"" I cover briefly The facts concerning lawrencia """bambi"""  bembenek. 

A police officer in Milwaukee when  her case became basically world head lines.



https://youtu.be/BCAOx02fKUQ

And regarding such a subject I will now say this.
I remember actually seeing footage of practically the entire milwaukee police force dancing completely naked at some party.





Some gathering.

And some of bambis fellow officers were actually telling lawrencia bembenek to take off all her clothes and dance joyfully in broad day light completely  nude with them .




To which " lawrenicia declined...






Saying
"" thanks but no thanks.





She wasnt into willingly prancing around  completely naked in front of everybody.
Publicly.




















A bit strange for a police officer.

But o well.



Aw yes.  lawrencia " being a cop at the time" made a comment" heard there that" she didnt think that was a good example to set for the public  if you were a police officer.

Lewd behaviour performed by a police officer "in broad day light.
Ooo? Really?

Yes... of course.
That would make sense.

For which " some milwaukee cops were offended with her.
I did read that. In a report .


In the version of facts the legendary crime writer " max haines gives of the events "" this led to bambi being set up and falsely accused of the murder of christine by various members of the Milwaukee police force.


Exactly.  Yes. Exactly. True. True.

Now 
' i've never seen a solid fact which would indicate her guilt.

And I have studied the case.

. AND YOU KNOW WHAT? BECAUSE OF THAT ^^^ I WILL ADMIT THIS .


 I - ENJOYED WATCHING HER MOCK THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM BY HER ESCQPE FROM THE UNITED STATES JAIL THEY UNJUSTLY HAD HER confined to....


AW YES.


^^AND ^ I ALSO  did enjoy the fuss the tv crews and media  DID make over her DARING QUITE PUBLICLY ADDRESSED FAMOUS escape.


It was actually fun to watch.  "" crowds EVERYWHERE IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES  GATHERING IN VARIOUS HUGE CITIES  were cheering RUN BAMBI RUN!!



IN FRONT OF TV NEWS CREWS.



IT WAS ACTUALLY COOL TO SEE THE REGULAR PUBLIC FET BEHIND THIS WOMAN AND CHEER HER ON.



CHEER HER ESCAPE FROM THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF AMERICA.
RIGHT ON.



RUN FROM A CORRUPT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN MILWAUKEE  PRETTY LADY...



AND RUN FROM A CLEARLY CORRUPT AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM .
RUN BABY RUN!!



YOU KNOW? THAT WAS ONE OF THE COOLEST THINGS I EVER SAW HAPPEN IN AMERICA.



IT WAS ACTUALLY  A COMPLETELY GREAT TIME !



WATCHING THAT!



 I HAD A GREAT TIME WATCHING THAT.



I CHEERED HER ON!!


LIKE ALL THOSE OTHER PEOPLE DID TOO...



PROVING THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNEW THIS WOMAN " LAWRENCIA BEMBENEK" HAD BEEN FALSELY CONVICTED OF A CRIME SHE CLEARLY DID NOT COMMIT.




And falsely accused.



SO SHE RIGHTEOUSLY STARTED RUNNING AWAY FROM SUCH A JUDGMENT.



RUN BAMBI RUN!



JUST LIKE ALL THOSE SIGNS PEOPLE WERE HOLDING AT THAT TIME  " SAID.!
ROCK ON BAMBI .! FOREVER!!



I MEAN IT WAS SO ABSOLUTELY  OBVIOUS SHE WAS INNOCENT OF THE CRIME THEY HAD CONVICTED HER OF THAT " TO SEE HER ESCAPE? 



THAT Did GOOD JOY TO A GOOD HEART.
YA KNOW?



On that note I say this.



Your running days are over sweet lady.
No more running sweet bambi.



Time to 
RIP .   LADY.



And "" in my opinion 
 YOUVE EARNED IT.

 



Two obviously innocent ladies. Lawrencia bembenek and .Sandra melger

This first post attached to this website will address the cases of sandra melger and lawrenicia bembenek. Two obviously innocent ladies who ...