This first post attached to this website will address the cases of sandra melger and lawrenicia bembenek. Two obviously innocent ladies who have had their lives destroyed by incompetent police forces in america. To the reader.
🧞♂️🗣🔉🎶🚴♀️😯🚴♂️yet the main purpose to this website is a review of true crime addressed on youtube.
📢🎶🦒🔊🐱🤸♂️🎵🤡okay. 🐯That said " I now begin this website with the following topic.
🦊🔔🎶which is the true crime subject which applies to a mrs sandra melger.
That lady and her story is where I will begin this website.
Which will cover a variety of true crime stories. Yet this lady"and her true crime story "" I feel is the best place" for this website to appropriately commence.
The subject of her crime? Or supposed crime? It is summarized in the video attached immediately below.
And"with every post attached to the first part of this website so that is where I shall begin the functions of each post. Including this one.
So I begin this post with the assumption that the readers have watched the video and therefore are aware of the general premises of each true crime case.
A brief note regaRding this website? It will include sarcastic sentiments .
In words images and videos.
Such images videos or sarcastic comments are attached to this site for rational purposes which aPply to what is obviously being addressed in each post .
In relation to the youtube videos attached to each post.
The prosecution " for example? In the case of sandra melger.
Smiled a lot.
Grinning deviously. almost . Reflective of matthew 10: 14 to 16 or 2nd peter 2: 11 to 15 of christianitys scriptures.
Or so it definitely looked.
To the reader: do note that truth.
So on that note here we go with the case of sandra melger.
Let us begin this post on such a womans apparent crime by first clarifying some basic obvious facts related to her crime.
Shall we? Yes let's do just that. By which factor i begin this post by first stating the following.
The police investigating this crime would have the public believe miss melger is a murderess.
But the police do offer some clues as to why they believe such a statement.
I debate their claims.
And i " like the narrator of this said video" on such a subject below give some very healthy explanations as to why i feel this woman is innocent of the crime of murder.
In this case.
In a world gone completely mad.
Wherein let's get into that very subject right now. Shall we? Yes. We shall. By stating this.
First off .....hello?
Did the police investigating this crime " first off" consider this statement?
Just because blood is spread about and a struggle seems to have occurred does not mean that is what happened.
Jim could have been killed fairly quickly by a psychopath who continued to stab jim.
Making it look like a struggle took place when jim was basically killed quickly.
A quick fatal blow and her husband is dead.
Or he had been subdued physically in a way his screams or shouts were muffled.
Not much noise coming from him after that.
She has the noise of the jacuzzi.
She also doesnt have good hearing.
A combination of lupus and arthritis plus the fact a jacuzzi can sometimes put you in laa laa land.
Where your in another world mentally.
Then you often miss sounds.
During certain times you are relaxing in a jacuzzi.
Also it appears she may have had a seizure while this was playing out.
Her neurologist testified this was probably what happened.
Which is also why she says she heard nothing.
Also" it's clear everyone was testifying she couldnt hold a knife and do what happened.
No evidence at all to suggest this woman even knew how to hire a professional killer .
Probably never even met one.
I dont think it ever even crossed her mind.
Clearly that's not her.
Clearly shes not a killer.
Also' shes tied up in a way where WITNESSES say she clearly clearly could not have tied herself up like that.
And then locked herself in a closet.
Those are all factors which would indicate this lady is completely innocent.
When it's that clear someone is innocent of a murder?
What the hell is this?
And your telling me this Chad guy' , whatever mike said his last name was" was not investigated basically at all?
AT ALL. THE POLICE STOPPED BY HIS PLACE? ONE MERRY DAY?
TO SAY HELLO?
HE WASNT HOME.
SO THEY LEFT THEIR CARD?
AND NEVER RETURNED TO TALK WITH HIM?
PERHAPS CHAD WASNT HOME BECAUSE, BECAUSE HE WAS OUT WITH HIS SPANISH GIRLFRIEND AT THE TIME?
PARTYING WITH others.
With THE MONEY THEY STOLE FROM THE MELGERS.
THAT SURE SOUNDS CORRECT.
WHY IS THIS WOMAN SITTING IN JAIL?
ARE THE POLICE IN THIS CASE FUCKING CRAZY?
THE POLICE NEED TO BE SUED.
BY SANDRA MEGERS DAUGHTER.
BECAUSE ITS WELL KNOWN THAT PEOPLE WHO SUFFER FROM EPILEPSY FORGET DETAILS.
THAT MEANS " BECAUSE THE POLICE DIDNT IMMEDIATELY SEARCH THAT POSSIBILITY OUT" CHAD HAD ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD TO TELL HIS SPANISH GIRL FRIEND AT THE TIME OF THE
MURDER TO LEAVE TOWN.
THE ONE WHO ACTUALLY STABBED JIM TO DEATH.
THE SPANISH WOMAN THAT SANDRA REMEMBERED.
WHILE CHAD STOOD BEHIND HER.
DURING THE KILLING.
What sort of police training are cops required to go through?
IN THIS AREA OF THE WORLD.
To be this incompetent?
Or corrupt? One or the other?
The cops in this case are obviously " really something else.
Serve and protect?
is that what you call this police work?
Sandra melger would have been better off here if two retarded moose were investigating this murder case in her defence.
This is worse detective work then the keddie cabin murders.
Anyways heres what most likely happened.
It was CHAD -WHATS HIS NAME.
AND SOME SPANISH WOMAN CHAD KNEW AT THE TIME.
WHO KILLED JIM.
IM PRETTY SURE.
Somebody they knew and who didnt like the melgers set this up.
MAYBE IT WAS THE NEIGHBOUR WHO HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT THE LITTLE PUPPIES BARKING.
OBVIOUSLY IT WAS SOMEBODY.
BUT IT WASNT SANDRA MELGER.
It was obviously a set up.
IF IT WASNT CHAD? WHICH I HIGHLY DOUBT IT WASNT THAT GUY.
THEN HERES WHAT YOU Do.
IN THIS CASE.
First true detective step here?
Talk to the daughter.
And sandra about any suspicious characters.
In their past.
Tell real detectives to begin there.
With these key stone cops in charge?
Pure and simple.
A final word?
On this case?
This is a letter I have forwarded to Sandra's lawyer.
In this case.
Addressed as follows.